Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260 +422%
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2014
Mobility FireGL
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
940 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
Topaz
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy