Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +6108%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mobility FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
120
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
AD107
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy