Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
9608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +28476%
41.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mobility FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1425 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
120
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
41.15 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
41.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
643.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
AD103
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy