ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 625M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (21.92GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 625M
+66%
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2007
Release Date
Oct 2012
M7x
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
685 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
21.92GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
15W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
M76
GPU Name
GF117
M76 XT-M
(216XJBKA13FG)
GPU Variant
N13M-GS-B-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
