Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs AMD FirePro W4190M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 560v and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
0.352 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M +96%
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Nov 2015
M9x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M96
GPU Name
Opal
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy