Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs AMD FirePro W6170M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 560v and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
0.352 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M +459%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
M9x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M96
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy