Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+70%
2.048 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.956 billion
Unknown
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
