Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+8%
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Feb 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
