Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +179%
5.733 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Apr 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net