Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 1 GB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+36624%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1 GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
G86S
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
