Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+23566%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.314 billion
Unknown
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
