Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+27207%
10.65 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2011
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
