Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+3380%
10.65 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2012
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
