Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1441%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
256
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
