Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+2034%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
20
256
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Oland
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
