Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Boost Clock1275MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+307%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560
2.611 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1175 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.40 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.60 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.611 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.611 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
163.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Polaris 21
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT
(215-0908004)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
