Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
RTX 5880 Ada Generation +550%
69.27 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
110
4096
Shading Units
14080
256
TMUs
440
256
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
285W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net