Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +738%
15.56 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2011
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
Unknown
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net