Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+1456%
15.56 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
800
256
TMUs
40
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
Unknown
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
