Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+6251%
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
8192
Shading Units
128
512
TMUs
64
512
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
150W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
