Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+500%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
512
TMUs
128
512
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
250W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
Unknown
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
