Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
Lower TDP (280W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+50%
24.58 TFLOPS
TITAN RTX
16.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2018
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
72
8192
Shading Units
4608
512
TMUs
288
512
ROPs
96
128
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
280W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-400-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
