Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 1000 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA NVS 1000 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 1000 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 1000
0.306 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650 +43%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2007
NVS
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
192
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy