Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 35W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1605MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +20971%
8.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
Unknown
57 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy