Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
12784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +167284%
65.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
100
16
Shading Units
12800
8
TMUs
400
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy