Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +6838%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Apr 2024
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
6
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA107
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy