Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +13420%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
NVS
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
18
48
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
AD107
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy