Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 4200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +20855%
32.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
76
48
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
AD103
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy