NVIDIA NVS 510 vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+5788%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Unknown
NVS
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
