Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +1773%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Apr 2014
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Vesuvius
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy