Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 810 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA NVS 810 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 810 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Boost Clock1033MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +441%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2017
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Base Clock
-
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
1058 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
33.06 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy