Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 810 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

NVIDIA NVS 810 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 810 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (68W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1050MHz vs 1033MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270X +154%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1058 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
33.06 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
168.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
180W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Curacao
-
GPU Variant
Curacao XT (215-0848004)
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy