Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 810 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 111% (2175MHz vs 1033MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +2426%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2023
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1058 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
33.06 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy