Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA P106 090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090 +338%
2.352 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
27
768
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GT200B
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy