NVIDIA P106M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P106M and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P106M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1665MHz vs 1291MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+731%
24.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1290 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
58
1152
Shading Units
7424
72
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
AD104
GP106-505-KC-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
