Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2000MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +235%
10.32 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
24
224
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy