Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +1243%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy