Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +26361%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy