Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro RG220

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +12800%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2010
Tesla
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
M93
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy