Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +80%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2014
Tesla
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
512bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2816
224
TMUs
176
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy