NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+5063%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
108
96
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
GA100
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
