NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+750%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
GK104
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
