Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M +355%
0.269 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
96
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
G84
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net