Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +33941%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
19456
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
MI300
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
146 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy