Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +2579%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
72
192
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
TU102
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy