Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D +1271%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
34W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G96
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy