Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +393%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy