Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D +2426%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
1
192
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.920 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.920 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.20 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G98
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy