Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +1763%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GP104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy