Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla K20m +634%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK110
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy